{"success":true,"count":2,"items":[{"videoId":"xSC92Fn0J9E","chunkIndex":0,"totalChunks":2,"title":"Rachel Botsman: How Technology is Changing Who we Trust — Part 1 of 2","thumbnail":"https://i.ytimg.com/vi/xSC92Fn0J9E/maxresdefault.jpg","duration":988,"uploader":"WIRED Podcasts","youtubeUrl":"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSC92Fn0J9E","keywords":["trust","technology","innovation","transparency","self-driving-cars","risk","psychology","business","digital-trust"],"normalizedKeywords":["비즈니스·전략","프로덕트","기술 트렌드"],"targetAudience":[{"who":"기획자","why":"기술을 신뢰하게 만드는 조건과 사용자 심리를 이해하는 데 유용함"},{"who":"리서처","why":"신뢰를 개념적으로 정의하고 행동 변화와 연결하는 관점을 제공함"},{"who":"창업자","why":"신뢰 상실이 제품 사용과 사업 지속에 미치는 영향을 배울 수 있음"}],"normalizedAudience":["창업자·스타트업","프로덕트 매니저·기획자","리서처·학자"],"summary":"이 영상은 기술 혁신이 확산되기 위해서는 단순한 기능 개선이 아니라 '신뢰의 도약'이 필요하다고 말한다. 화자는 증기기관차, 자율주행차, 낯선 사람에게 휴대폰을 맡기는 실험을 통해 신뢰가 무엇인지 설명하며, 신뢰를 'known과 unknown을 잇는 다리'로 정의한다. 또한 기업이 신뢰를 잃어도 당장 매출이 유지되는 이유를 '거래의 화폐'와 '상호작용의 화폐'라는 관점으로 풀어내고, 투명성이 만능 해결책이라는 통념에 의문을 제기한다.","insights":["새 기술의 확산은 기능보다 신뢰의 허들을 넘는 문제다.","신뢰는 위험 자체가 아니라, 불확실성을 건너게 하는 힘이다.","기업은 돈이 아니라 상호작용의 신뢰를 잃을 때 더 치명적이다.","투명성만으로는 깨진 신뢰를 복구할 수 없다.","혁신은 사람들이 '안전하게 믿을 이유'를 가질 때 퍼진다."],"keyClips":[{"clipId":"xSC92Fn0J9E:c0:1-16","startSegmentIndex":1,"endSegmentIndex":16,"startTime":6.889,"endTime":173.26,"durationSeconds":166.4,"preview":"신뢰 도약의 시작","mustSee":false},{"clipId":"xSC92Fn0J9E:c0:17-33","startSegmentIndex":17,"endSegmentIndex":33,"startTime":173.26,"endTime":298.02,"durationSeconds":124.8,"preview":"자율주행차와 불안","mustSee":false},{"clipId":"xSC92Fn0J9E:c0:34-50","startSegmentIndex":34,"endSegmentIndex":50,"startTime":298.02,"endTime":468.629,"durationSeconds":170.6,"preview":"신뢰의 정의","mustSee":true},{"clipId":"xSC92Fn0J9E:c0:51-58","startSegmentIndex":51,"endSegmentIndex":58,"startTime":468.629,"endTime":563.61,"durationSeconds":95,"preview":"신뢰 상실의 대가","mustSee":false},{"clipId":"xSC92Fn0J9E:c0:59-64","startSegmentIndex":59,"endSegmentIndex":64,"startTime":563.61,"endTime":602.99,"durationSeconds":39.4,"preview":"투명성의 한계","mustSee":false}],"curatedSegments":[{"segmentIndex":50,"text":"So the easiest way to think of trust is quite literally a bridge between the known and the unknown, and that's why my definition of trust is so simple: trust is a confident relationship with the unknown.","startTime":450.24,"endTime":468.629,"durationSeconds":18,"level":"B2","overallScore":9,"rationale":"핵심 정의와 비유가 모두 뛰어남."},{"segmentIndex":15,"text":"Trust is a confident relationship with the unknown.","startTime":707.35,"endTime":711.06,"durationSeconds":4,"level":"B2","overallScore":8.4,"rationale":"신뢰의 정의를 압축한 통찰 문장."},{"segmentIndex":19,"text":"But if our ultimate goal is to make things transparent, what we're heading for is actually we're reducing the need for trust. We're not increasing trust.","startTime":740.68,"endTime":750.94,"durationSeconds":10,"level":"C1","overallScore":8.8,"rationale":"투명성과 신뢰의 역설을 날카롭게 제시."},{"segmentIndex":38,"text":"So I think to restore, to get rid of that question mark, I should say, to remove the question mark, we need to figure out how to move tech companies' cultures from a focus on efficiency and growth at all costs to integrity at scale.","startTime":890.279,"endTime":910.089,"durationSeconds":20,"level":"C1","overallScore":9,"rationale":"해법 제시와 고급 표현이 모두 풍부함."},{"segmentIndex":42,"text":"Trust needs friction. It needs us to slow down. It needs time. It needs continuous investment and effort to make sure the good intentions that often the core of a product's an organization to begin with don't get lost somewhere along the way.","startTime":930.629,"endTime":950.3389999999999,"durationSeconds":20,"level":"C1","overallScore":8.8,"rationale":"신뢰 형성 조건을 설득력 있게 제시함."},{"segmentIndex":43,"text":"So I think when we're calling for transparency, what we're actually seeking is reassurance and confidence that a company's intentions and incentives are aligned with the well-being of people and society, that they have at scale achieved integrity, and they deserve our trust.","startTime":950.3389999999999,"endTime":972.519,"durationSeconds":22,"level":"C1","overallScore":9,"rationale":"투명성 요구의 본질을 정교하게 설명함."},{"segmentIndex":5,"text":"So what I want to do today is explore what really is at stake when we talk about trust in technology being eroded, and why I believe transparency in itself is not the answer.","startTime":48.3,"endTime":61.85,"durationSeconds":14,"level":"C1","overallScore":7.8,"rationale":"핵심 문제의식과 고급 표현이 좋음."},{"segmentIndex":12,"text":"Now, this is a dead true story, and I know it sounds ridiculous today, but it's actually a beautiful illustration of what I call a trust leap.","startTime":122.549,"endTime":131.76,"durationSeconds":9,"level":"B2","overallScore":7.8,"rationale":"핵심 개념을 선명하게 정의해 줌."},{"segmentIndex":14,"text":"Now, trust leap happens when we take a risk to do something new or in a fundamentally different way, and trust leaps play a really important role in our lives.","startTime":135.47,"endTime":146.63,"durationSeconds":11,"level":"B2","overallScore":8,"rationale":"개념 정의와 일반화가 모두 선명함."},{"segmentIndex":15,"text":"They enable us to cross that gap of uncertainty, and when we've seen that enough people have survived the leap, that the uterus didn't fall out, and they've benefited from it, millions of people will quickly follow.","startTime":146.63,"endTime":162.709,"durationSeconds":16,"level":"B2","overallScore":7.8,"rationale":"신뢰 확산 메커니즘을 잘 설명함."},{"segmentIndex":16,"text":"So trust leaps, they break down barriers, they create new possibilities, and they show how trust is a conduit for new ideas to travel.","startTime":162.709,"endTime":173.26,"durationSeconds":11,"level":"B2","overallScore":7.6,"rationale":"신뢰의 기능을 압축한 통찰 문장."},{"segmentIndex":33,"text":"And in the modern world, we are being asked to leap faster and higher than ever before, and that's why trust matters so much in technology.","startTime":285.6,"endTime":298.02,"durationSeconds":12,"level":"B2","overallScore":7.8,"rationale":"현대 사회와 신뢰의 중요성을 연결함."},{"segmentIndex":47,"text":"The line between these two things is what we call risk, is exposure to uncertainty with a potential loss that matters.","startTime":431.009,"endTime":441.33,"durationSeconds":10,"level":"C1","overallScore":8,"rationale":"위험의 정의가 명확하고 고급스럽다."},{"segmentIndex":51,"text":"Now when you start to view trust through this lens, you start to see why it's this beautiful alchemy of expectations and vulnerability, why it's a mixture of our hopes and our fears, and why it hurts when it breaks down when people abuse our trust.","startTime":468.629,"endTime":488.9,"durationSeconds":20,"level":"C1","overallScore":8,"rationale":"감정과 개념을 깊이 있게 풀어냄."},{"segmentIndex":54,"text":"The first is there's often a lag time in user behavior because for most users convenience will trump trust to a point, so they will go for convenience until there's some other viable alternative.","startTime":506.159,"endTime":521.529,"durationSeconds":15,"level":"C1","overallScore":8.2,"rationale":"행동 지연의 원인을 날카롭게 설명함."},{"segmentIndex":56,"text":"There's money, which is the currency of transactions, and you can lose trust and you can continue to transact, but money is only going to go so far because what you've lost is the currency of interactions.","startTime":528.279,"endTime":544.87,"durationSeconds":17,"level":"C1","overallScore":8,"rationale":"거래와 상호작용 대비가 통찰적이다."},{"segmentIndex":57,"text":"And so what happens over time is that company loses permission to play an interactive role in your life.","startTime":544.87,"endTime":554.2,"durationSeconds":9,"level":"C1","overallScore":8,"rationale":"신뢰 상실의 결과를 선명히 보여줌."},{"segmentIndex":64,"text":"Well, actually, it's not, and I want to explain why, because this narrative that transparency is the solution to\"","startTime":592.99,"endTime":602.99,"durationSeconds":10,"level":"B2","overallScore":8,"rationale":"핵심 반박과 설명 예고로 통찰·표현 모두 강함."},{"segmentIndex":1,"text":"\"That transparency is the solution to building more trust is absolutely everywhere, so I don't want to harp on about Facebook, but it's a beautiful illustration of how we've jumped to this solution of transparency.","startTime":601.5,"endTime":611.74,"durationSeconds":10,"level":"C1","overallScore":7.8,"rationale":"투명성 맹신을 비판하는 통찰적 문장."},{"segmentIndex":16,"text":"Trust and risk are brother and sister, but trust and transparency are not independent; they're dependent.","startTime":711.06,"endTime":718.48,"durationSeconds":7,"level":"C1","overallScore":7.8,"rationale":"신뢰·위험·투명성 관계를 선명히 설명."}],"generatedAt":"2026-06-24T23:17:16.843Z","keyClipsTotalSec":387},{"videoId":"xSC92Fn0J9E","chunkIndex":1,"totalChunks":2,"title":"Rachel Botsman: How Technology is Changing Who we Trust — Part 2 of 2","thumbnail":"https://i.ytimg.com/vi/xSC92Fn0J9E/maxresdefault.jpg","duration":988,"uploader":"WIRED Podcasts","youtubeUrl":"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSC92Fn0J9E","keywords":["trust","transparency","ethics","technology","social-media","business","leadership","psychology","governance"],"normalizedKeywords":["비즈니스·전략","리더십·매니지먼트","기술 트렌드"],"targetAudience":[{"who":"제품/정책 기획자","why":"기능의 투명성보다 신뢰를 만드는 구조를 설계하는 관점이 유용함"},{"who":"창업자","why":"성장과 효율 중심 문화가 신뢰를 해칠 수 있다는 경고를 얻을 수 있음"},{"who":"리서처/학자","why":"신뢰를 감정이 아닌 개념과 구성요소로 분해한 분석이 핵심임"}],"normalizedAudience":["창업자·스타트업","프로덕트 매니저·기획자","리서처·학자"],"summary":"이 영상은 '투명성이 곧 신뢰'라는 흔한 전제를 비판하며, 오히려 신뢰는 불확실성을 견디게 하는 관계이고 그 핵심은 '신뢰할 수 있음(trustworthiness)'이라고 설명한다. 화자는 신뢰를 능력(capability)과 인성(character)으로 나누고, 그중에서도 가장 자주 무너지는 지점은 선의가 아니라 이해관계와 의도의 불일치, 즉 integrity라고 강조한다.\n\n따라서 기술 기업이 신뢰를 회복하려면 효율과 성장만 추구하는 문화에서 벗어나, 사람과 사회의 이익과 정렬된 'integrity at scale'을 만들어야 한다고 주장한다. 결국 우리가 투명성을 요구하는 이유는 모든 것을 공개하라는 뜻이 아니라, 그 기업이 믿을 만한 의도와 인센티브를 가졌는지 확인하고 싶은 것이기 때문이다.","insights":["투명성은 신뢰의 대체재가 아니라 신뢰의 보조장치다.","신뢰의 핵심은 능력보다 의도와 이해관계의 정렬이다.","효율이 높을수록 신뢰는 줄 수 있어, 일부 마찰이 필요하다.","신뢰를 키우려면 '보이게 하기'보다 '믿을 이유 만들기'가 먼저다.","기술 조직의 과제는 성장 최적화가 아니라 integrity의 확장이다."],"keyClips":[{"clipId":"xSC92Fn0J9E:c1:1-11","startSegmentIndex":1,"endSegmentIndex":11,"startTime":601.5,"endTime":695.29,"durationSeconds":93.8,"preview":"투명성 집착의 함정","mustSee":false},{"clipId":"xSC92Fn0J9E:c1:14-20","startSegmentIndex":14,"endSegmentIndex":20,"startTime":703.12,"endTime":763.36,"durationSeconds":60.2,"preview":"신뢰의 정의 재설정","mustSee":false},{"clipId":"xSC92Fn0J9E:c1:21-37","startSegmentIndex":21,"endSegmentIndex":37,"startTime":763.36,"endTime":890.279,"durationSeconds":126.9,"preview":"신뢰의 네 가지 재료","mustSee":true},{"clipId":"xSC92Fn0J9E:c1:38-44","startSegmentIndex":38,"endSegmentIndex":44,"startTime":890.279,"endTime":979.389,"durationSeconds":89.1,"preview":"효율보다 신뢰 문화","mustSee":true}],"curatedSegments":[{"segmentIndex":50,"text":"So the easiest way to think of trust is quite literally a bridge between the known and the unknown, and that's why my definition of trust is so simple: trust is a confident relationship with the unknown.","startTime":450.24,"endTime":468.629,"durationSeconds":18,"level":"B2","overallScore":9,"rationale":"핵심 정의와 비유가 모두 뛰어남."},{"segmentIndex":15,"text":"Trust is a confident relationship with the unknown.","startTime":707.35,"endTime":711.06,"durationSeconds":4,"level":"B2","overallScore":8.4,"rationale":"신뢰의 정의를 압축한 통찰 문장."},{"segmentIndex":19,"text":"But if our ultimate goal is to make things transparent, what we're heading for is actually we're reducing the need for trust. We're not increasing trust.","startTime":740.68,"endTime":750.94,"durationSeconds":10,"level":"C1","overallScore":8.8,"rationale":"투명성과 신뢰의 역설을 날카롭게 제시."},{"segmentIndex":38,"text":"So I think to restore, to get rid of that question mark, I should say, to remove the question mark, we need to figure out how to move tech companies' cultures from a focus on efficiency and growth at all costs to integrity at scale.","startTime":890.279,"endTime":910.089,"durationSeconds":20,"level":"C1","overallScore":9,"rationale":"해법 제시와 고급 표현이 모두 풍부함."},{"segmentIndex":42,"text":"Trust needs friction. It needs us to slow down. It needs time. It needs continuous investment and effort to make sure the good intentions that often the core of a product's an organization to begin with don't get lost somewhere along the way.","startTime":930.629,"endTime":950.3389999999999,"durationSeconds":20,"level":"C1","overallScore":8.8,"rationale":"신뢰 형성 조건을 설득력 있게 제시함."},{"segmentIndex":43,"text":"So I think when we're calling for transparency, what we're actually seeking is reassurance and confidence that a company's intentions and incentives are aligned with the well-being of people and society, that they have at scale achieved integrity, and they deserve our trust.","startTime":950.3389999999999,"endTime":972.519,"durationSeconds":22,"level":"C1","overallScore":9,"rationale":"투명성 요구의 본질을 정교하게 설명함."},{"segmentIndex":5,"text":"So what I want to do today is explore what really is at stake when we talk about trust in technology being eroded, and why I believe transparency in itself is not the answer.","startTime":48.3,"endTime":61.85,"durationSeconds":14,"level":"C1","overallScore":7.8,"rationale":"핵심 문제의식과 고급 표현이 좋음."},{"segmentIndex":12,"text":"Now, this is a dead true story, and I know it sounds ridiculous today, but it's actually a beautiful illustration of what I call a trust leap.","startTime":122.549,"endTime":131.76,"durationSeconds":9,"level":"B2","overallScore":7.8,"rationale":"핵심 개념을 선명하게 정의해 줌."},{"segmentIndex":14,"text":"Now, trust leap happens when we take a risk to do something new or in a fundamentally different way, and trust leaps play a really important role in our lives.","startTime":135.47,"endTime":146.63,"durationSeconds":11,"level":"B2","overallScore":8,"rationale":"개념 정의와 일반화가 모두 선명함."},{"segmentIndex":15,"text":"They enable us to cross that gap of uncertainty, and when we've seen that enough people have survived the leap, that the uterus didn't fall out, and they've benefited from it, millions of people will quickly follow.","startTime":146.63,"endTime":162.709,"durationSeconds":16,"level":"B2","overallScore":7.8,"rationale":"신뢰 확산 메커니즘을 잘 설명함."},{"segmentIndex":16,"text":"So trust leaps, they break down barriers, they create new possibilities, and they show how trust is a conduit for new ideas to travel.","startTime":162.709,"endTime":173.26,"durationSeconds":11,"level":"B2","overallScore":7.6,"rationale":"신뢰의 기능을 압축한 통찰 문장."},{"segmentIndex":33,"text":"And in the modern world, we are being asked to leap faster and higher than ever before, and that's why trust matters so much in technology.","startTime":285.6,"endTime":298.02,"durationSeconds":12,"level":"B2","overallScore":7.8,"rationale":"현대 사회와 신뢰의 중요성을 연결함."},{"segmentIndex":47,"text":"The line between these two things is what we call risk, is exposure to uncertainty with a potential loss that matters.","startTime":431.009,"endTime":441.33,"durationSeconds":10,"level":"C1","overallScore":8,"rationale":"위험의 정의가 명확하고 고급스럽다."},{"segmentIndex":51,"text":"Now when you start to view trust through this lens, you start to see why it's this beautiful alchemy of expectations and vulnerability, why it's a mixture of our hopes and our fears, and why it hurts when it breaks down when people abuse our trust.","startTime":468.629,"endTime":488.9,"durationSeconds":20,"level":"C1","overallScore":8,"rationale":"감정과 개념을 깊이 있게 풀어냄."},{"segmentIndex":54,"text":"The first is there's often a lag time in user behavior because for most users convenience will trump trust to a point, so they will go for convenience until there's some other viable alternative.","startTime":506.159,"endTime":521.529,"durationSeconds":15,"level":"C1","overallScore":8.2,"rationale":"행동 지연의 원인을 날카롭게 설명함."},{"segmentIndex":56,"text":"There's money, which is the currency of transactions, and you can lose trust and you can continue to transact, but money is only going to go so far because what you've lost is the currency of interactions.","startTime":528.279,"endTime":544.87,"durationSeconds":17,"level":"C1","overallScore":8,"rationale":"거래와 상호작용 대비가 통찰적이다."},{"segmentIndex":57,"text":"And so what happens over time is that company loses permission to play an interactive role in your life.","startTime":544.87,"endTime":554.2,"durationSeconds":9,"level":"C1","overallScore":8,"rationale":"신뢰 상실의 결과를 선명히 보여줌."},{"segmentIndex":64,"text":"Well, actually, it's not, and I want to explain why, because this narrative that transparency is the solution to\"","startTime":592.99,"endTime":602.99,"durationSeconds":10,"level":"B2","overallScore":8,"rationale":"핵심 반박과 설명 예고로 통찰·표현 모두 강함."},{"segmentIndex":1,"text":"\"That transparency is the solution to building more trust is absolutely everywhere, so I don't want to harp on about Facebook, but it's a beautiful illustration of how we've jumped to this solution of transparency.","startTime":601.5,"endTime":611.74,"durationSeconds":10,"level":"C1","overallScore":7.8,"rationale":"투명성 맹신을 비판하는 통찰적 문장."},{"segmentIndex":16,"text":"Trust and risk are brother and sister, but trust and transparency are not independent; they're dependent.","startTime":711.06,"endTime":718.48,"durationSeconds":7,"level":"C1","overallScore":7.8,"rationale":"신뢰·위험·투명성 관계를 선명히 설명."}],"generatedAt":"2026-06-24T23:17:46.009Z","keyClipsTotalSec":387}]}